Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 2:19 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

Laze n gemmen, I direct you to the topic of this post. wink

I'm not claiming that he was not great. I just don't consider him a genius.

 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 2:22 PM   
 By:   Heath   (Member)

Laze n gemmen, I direct you to the topic of this post. wink

I'm not claiming that he was not great. I just don't consider him a genius.


Why not?

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 2:30 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

Why not?

Because we first need to establish criteria for assessing genius, and I'm not sure everyone would agree on those criteria. From your posts, It seems that I may be setting the bar higher than you are, I don't know. I think geniuses are an extremely rare breed, people who really shake things up, are at the forefront of a radical innovation, who change the world, and make us see or experience reality differently. It is not a word I would use lightly.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 2:56 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

I will add that, given the fact that film scores are works made for hire, I do not think a true musical genius (by my criteria) would have the temperament to work in that environment under such tight restrictions. They may not have the skill set either.

 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 3:07 PM   
 By:   Heath   (Member)

Well your criteria almost exactly fits Goldsmith. He may not have changed the world exactly (but then again that should not be a prerequisite for genius, otherwise we'd have Hitler, Bin laden et al up there), but he CERTAINLY changed film music and influenced it like no other.

You seem to be suggesting that by its nature geniuses cannot exist in the commercial world of film music. Incorrect, I think. In fact if a composer can make valuable innovations in this field as Goldsmith did, then it's actually more likely that they ARE geniuses.

BTW you only have to be a genius at one thing at a a time, you know. It doesn't mean that because you're a musical genius you're also HAVE to be a genius at geography! I understand that Einstein could barely tie his shoelaces! big grin

 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 3:29 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

but he CERTAINLY changed film music and influenced it like no other.


How did Goldsmith change or influence film music? I would say Zimmer changed and influence film music a lot more than Goldsmith. Does that make him a genius?

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 3:31 PM   
 By:   Howard L   (Member)

Labeling our favorite artists as geniuses is ultimately a narcissistic act. It is really more about validating our tastes than it is about assessing the qualities of the artists we admire.

Sometimes it may be nothing more than expressing a sentiment.


Yes, but the implication is that "X must be a genius if (s)he can so deeply appeal to someone with such refined tastes as I."


If you say so!

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 3:33 PM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

Goldsmith really didn't influence anything in a major way, although you could argue that there are elements in his music that inspired particular composers or smaller trends (like the 'sex thriller' sound following BASIC INSTINCT). He was, however, part of a scene -- especially in the late 60s -- that pushed the envelope beyond the 'classical'.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 3:47 PM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

Goldsmith really didn't influence anything in a major way, although you could argue that there are elements in his music that inspired particular composers or smaller trends (like the 'sex thriller' sound following BASIC INSTINCT). He was, however, part of a scene -- especially in the late 60s -- that pushed the envelope beyond the 'classical'.

I agree. Goldsmith - like most US film composers in the 20th century - was working with forms and techniques that had already been well established in "serious" music, jazz, electronic, and other genres. He was not at the forefront of any major musical movement. That's not a knock against Goldsmith, but simply a recognition of how film music typically fits into the bigger musical picture.

 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 4:15 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

I wouldn't call him a genius, no (I reserve that description for some very few), but he was a master of his craft, no doubt. Especially in the 60s and 70s. Funnily, though, I enjoy his 90s soundtracks the most in terms of sheer listening pleasure -- a time when he nurtured more mainstream sounds and had lost some of his "edge".

Name your geniuses. I will try, patiently, to explain to you why they're not. (Half joking wink)


In terms of film music?

Hmmm. Well, John Williams is one. Maybe Elliot Goldenthal. Vangelis. And although I'm not a hardcore fan, Bernard Herrmann. Not many else that I can think of right now.

(there are also those who tap into genius territory on occasion -- like Ennio Morricone, James Horner or Hans Zimmer -- but where I perhaps wouldn't apply the label to them as a whole).

For most of his career, Goldsmith was an excellent craftsman, first and foremost. But then he reached high ambitious and artistic levels on occasion (POTA, PATTON, ALIEN etc.). But a genius, he was not (IMO).


I agree with Thor, mostly because I can't imagine Goldsmith agreeing that he was a genius. I also don't think John Williams would call himself one either.

You guys are silly.

 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 4:15 PM   
 By:   Heath   (Member)

Boy... there's a lot of revisionism going on here. There's relativism and then there's just trying to re-write history. Goldsmith not influential? Oh boy oh boy.... big grin

BTW, Zimmer is influential mainly for one reason - its the sound producers are paying for, thus that's the sound other composers HAVE TO make. To my knowledge, such obligatory replication was not quite so aggressively enforced in Goldsmith's day

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 4:50 PM   
 By:   DurianMan   (Member)

A talented composer, yes. A genius, probably not. It's hard to ignore the fact that many of his later scores weren't that inspired and tended to be pretty generic. I suspect that even he would have admitted that.

Personally I only like a handful of his scores: Poltergeist I, II, and maybe Rudy. I think even James Horner did better with Star Trek II and III than he did with the first one (which sounded like a dry run for Poltergeist to me).

Now John Williams, that's another story smile ...

 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 5:03 PM   
 By:   edwzoomom   (Member)


Looks like the OP got exactly what he was seeking - attention and a few goats.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 5:07 PM   
 By:   Doc Loch   (Member)

Goldsmith really didn't influence anything in a major way, although you could argue that there are elements in his music that inspired particular composers or smaller trends (like the 'sex thriller' sound following BASIC INSTINCT). He was, however, part of a scene -- especially in the late 60s -- that pushed the envelope beyond the 'classical'.

And it could be argued that Pino Donaggio (with Dressed to Kill and others scores) and some of the other Italian composers in the 1970s established that "sex thriller" sound long before Goldsmith used it for Basic Instinct.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 5:50 PM   
 By:   Spymaster   (Member)

You can't equate genius to how influencial or copyable they were, rather and only by how brilliant they were.

If you want to assess the creative genius of JG you only have to listen to the scores for the remakes of The Omen, Total Recall and Poltergeist. And try Poltergeist III and Basic Instinct 2.

I would argue that JG was so consistently brilliant that his genius was taken for granted.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 5:50 PM   
 By:   Spymaster   (Member)

DP. Not so genius!

 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 6:31 PM   
 By:   Paul MacLean   (Member)

Goldsmith was a musician's musician, whose work was probably better appreciated by other musicians rather than listeners. Certainly he was one of the most imitated people in his field, and his influence resonates through an entire generation of film composers. Lukas Kendall astutely observed "He was the original Howard Shore, the original Thomas Newman, the original Danny Elfman". And you can hear his influence in the scores of many others -- Horner, Kamen, Silvestri, Young, Poledouris, Beltrami, etc.

I don't know if Goldsmith was a "genius" (I haven't seen his I.Q. test results), but he was certainly venerated by a lot of very fine (and discriminating) musicians.

 
 Posted:   Apr 17, 2016 - 11:13 PM   
 By:   Amer Zahid   (Member)

Goldsmith was a musician's musician, whose work was probably better appreciated by other musicians rather than listeners. Certainly he was one of the most imitated people in his field, and his influence resonates through an entire generation of film composers. Lukas Kendall astutely observed "He was the original Howard Shore, the original Thomas Newman, the original Danny Elfman". And you can hear his influence in the scores of many others -- Horner, Kamen, Silvestri, Young, Poledouris, Beltrami, etc.

I don't know if Goldsmith was a "genius" (I haven't seen his I.Q. test results), but he was certainly venerated by a lot of very fine (and discriminating) musicians.


Agreed. He was an extraordinary craftsman who understood the business of making movies and music together. He wrote great and outstanding music but also wrote mediocre music too- that was his genius! He always rose to the occasion. His volume of works today speak of his ingenuity. We are still buying and listening to his music, after all. Its as if he never left us.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 18, 2016 - 1:01 AM   
 By:   Rollin Hand   (Member)



Name your geniuses. I will try, patiently, to explain to you why they're not. (Half joking wink)



What about the other Jerry? I mean Fielding. Genius or not from your frame of reference?

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 18, 2016 - 1:54 AM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

Goldsmith really didn't influence anything in a major way, although you could argue that there are elements in his music that inspired particular composers or smaller trends (like the 'sex thriller' sound following BASIC INSTINCT). He was, however, part of a scene -- especially in the late 60s -- that pushed the envelope beyond the 'classical'.

And it could be argued that Pino Donaggio (with Dressed to Kill and others scores) and some of the other Italian composers in the 1970s established that "sex thriller" sound long before Goldsmith used it for Basic Instinct.


Yeah, but I was not talking about the sex thriller genre in general (with sleazy saxophones and so). That's a genre (and a score genre) that predates Donaggio by decades. I'm talking a specific 90s sound with those chilly, icy synths and drawn out chords and weird arpeggios. You could hear that in a number of sex thrillers in the next 5-6 years, before it went out of fashion.

But that's a minor trend in the scheme of things. There are a couple of other examples, as well as composers mimicking Goldsmith's rhytmic action figures (like McNeely's SOLDIER) and such.

But beyond that? No, I can't see any big Goldsmith influence the way composers like Steiner, Herrmann, Williams (with STAR WARS), Zimmer etc. influenced the whole approach and even industry as such. I would be curious to hear what Heath had in mind in that department?

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.