Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2012 - 9:47 PM   
 By:   Jeff Bond   (Member)

The movie is about a corrupt kingdom that is sacrificing its children to a dragon that even God can't strike down. Most of the movie is shot at night or under cloudy skies and against walls of black, wet shale. I think North's score fits the film perfectly--and I think some of the best scores are the ones you don't quite "get" on first listen. That's counterintuitive (since to communicate to an audience ostensibly a score would HAVE to be "gotten" on first listen) but I've had this experience more than once.
I still adore the score to Spartacus but I actually prefer the listening experience of Dragonslayer and Cleopatra--and it's precisely the feel-good excesses of Spartacus that tire me out (I can only listen to so much music for slaves happily celebrating their freedom). I like North's darker, moodier side.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2012 - 9:56 PM   
 By:   Redokt64   (Member)

The movie is about a corrupt kingdom that is sacrificing its children to a dragon that even God can't strike down. Most of the movie is shot at night or under cloudy skies and against walls of black, wet shale. I think North's score fits the film perfectly--and I think some of the best scores are the ones you don't quite "get" on first listen. That's counterintuitive (since to communicate to an audience ostensibly a score would HAVE to be "gotten" on first listen) but I've had this experience more than once.
I still adore the score to Spartacus but I actually prefer the listening experience of Dragonslayer and Cleopatra--and it's precisely the feel-good excesses of Spartacus that tire me out (I can only listen to so much music for slaves happily celebrating their freedom). I like North's darker, moodier side.


Great comments Jeff... smile Dragonslayer is a superb score.

 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2012 - 10:05 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Don't want to fan the embers again, but I happened to catch the film on Foxtel the other day and was so immensely irritated by the score's inappropriateness that I just had to tell someone (and yes, you're the lucky people). I won't comment on the music as music, but the score was just so...so...wrong! This is a story about an apprentice wizard who tries to take over when his master is slain--I mean that's basically it. North's score is about a guy who's just lost his job, his wife has left him and his son is contemplating suicide. I mean it's just the wrong score, whatever its merits. It doesn't belong. Whenever anything starts to happen that we should be getting excited about, North is writing long-held tuba notes, and it does nothing for the scene. Absolutely no excitement is added, and ultimately it becomes difficult to know exactly what we should be feeling in any given scene because the music give us no clues; it sounds indeed like a radio playing in another room.

Sorry to those people who admire the score. By all means keep listening, but you'll never convince me that this was the right score for this Disney movie. I can only echo the conclusion from the Filmtracks review: "It's disgracefully out of place...".


Amazing. I just watched this film a few days ago and agree a thousand percent. I didn't post here afterwards not wanting to stir the pot either. But since you brought it up. Yes, the score is completely inappropriate for the film. Worse yet the score almost ruins the film. Its worse than your typical droning wallpaper score that we get nowadays because it totally takes you out of the scenes. Others are free to love it, but it's one of the worst scores in modern history IMHO. Other than a few "Godzilla vs Mothra" notes it fails horribly. If only Williams or Horner got their hands on this film.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2012 - 10:12 PM   
 By:   pp312   (Member)

The movie is about a corrupt kingdom that is sacrificing its children to a dragon that even God can't strike down. Most of the movie is shot at night or under cloudy skies and against walls of black, wet shale. I think North's score fits the film perfectly--and I think some of the best scores are the ones you don't quite "get" on first listen. That's counterintuitive (since to communicate to an audience ostensibly a score would HAVE to be "gotten" on first listen) but I've had this experience more than once.


Well, I've seen the film several times and the score seems more wrong and irritating each time. I wonder how long it would take the average audience of a Disney film called "Dragonslayer" to "get" the score, since most woud only ever see it once. And therein lies my point: not that the music does nothing for these tired old ears, but that it does nothing for the movie and will not "sell" the movie to the typical audience, which I've always assumed is something the score is supposed to do. You can intellectualise it, say it fits the moody cinematography or whatever, but to me--and judging by some of the comments many others--it just sounds like the music editor put in the wrong track.

 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2012 - 10:28 PM   
 By:   Amer Zahid   (Member)

Alex North is one of the few composers I have really not gotten into properly. I have collected a few scores such as CLEOPATRA, 2001 and DRAGON SLAYER -which I loved as a film and was really taken by the dark and dreary score which I feel also upheld the film in many ways. On getting the cd from La La Land I did play a few selections but found the matter to be requiring a serious listen and contemplation. It helps watching the movie for it to bond with my listening experience and its been nearly 15 years since I last saw it. So thanks for bringing this discussion. I need to bring this out today from the closet and get immersed.

 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2012 - 10:37 PM   
 By:   Jeff Bond   (Member)

How many people have actually seen this movie in a theater?

 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2012 - 10:41 PM   
 By:   Adm Naismith   (Member)

Alex North is one of the few composers I have really not gotten into properly. I have collected a few scores such as CLEOPATRA, 2001 and DRAGON SLAYER -which I loved as a film and was really taken by the dark and dreary score which I feel also upheld the film in many ways. On getting the cd from La La Land I did play a few selections but found the matter to be requiring a serious listen and contemplation. It helps watching the movie for it to bond with my listening experience and its been nearly 15 years since I last saw it. So thanks for bringing this discussion. I need to bring this out today from the closet and get immersed.


I had heard North's Dragonslayer and Spartacus, maybe other stuff early in my listening career. As much as I have liked modern- and post- modern music, North was still missing something for me. Then I heard 'A Streetcar Named Desire' and it all fell into place for me. I don't know how or why, but Streetcar was my key to North.

I fell in love with Dragonslayer the moment Liberace played it as part of an 'Oscar Nominated Medly' on the Johnny Carson show the year it was nominated.

 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2012 - 10:52 PM   
 By:   Jeff Bond   (Member)

I have a strong suspicion that a jolly, happy score would have just as many people saying it didn't fit...this is a movie where a princess sacrifices herself and has her leg chewed off (graphically) by baby dragons. People went in expecting a Disney film and got something much darker. And in my experience of seeing the film during its original release, the score was harrowing and added a great deal to the menace of the dragon scenes (if you've only seen this film on television, even in hi-def, the visual effects are SERIOUSLY compromised and don't do justice to the effect they had in the original theatrical presentation, where they were quite seamless and convincing).
At any rate, if you don't like it, you don't like it--but you'll have no better luck convincing me that I didn't like it than I will of convincing you that you did.

 
 Posted:   Apr 24, 2012 - 11:17 PM   
 By:   Erik Woods   (Member)

As some have pointed out in this thread (and in other threads in the past) North's score could easily be passed off as "random noise." However, IMO, North's score is quite possibly one of the most accomplished film scores ever written. It's a raw, brutal, dissonant, avant-garde composition with unusual instrumentation and orchestrations. There is no sense of adventure or fun. Dragonslayer is an angry, atonal score with a sense of dread and darkness with masterful contrapuntal writing.

But to truly understand or "get" this score it needs your full attention. This isn't a score you throw on in the background. As the liner notes stated (SCSE release) North tackled this as more of a concert work, which might help some listeners with its coherency. The music flows wonderfully from track to track.

And while some disapprove of its use in the film I think it helps immensely to see the film and experience North's music in context. That's where it works its magic! For those that can keep an open mind will be rewarded by what they hear!

I also think that some have been left disappointed by their own personal expectations. Fantasy/adventure music during that time had an established sound. Lush, thematic, easily identifiable symphonic music. North pushed the boundaries.

Another point to ponder. In the liner notes it is said that besides the relationship between Galan and Valerian everything else was impersonal to North. You know what? It shows in the music. There aren't any lush, grand, emotionally satisfying, tonal themes with one exception... the love theme, which is rather lovely.

It's a challenging score and I can completely understand why some absolutely loathe it. I know I did when I first heard it but now after all these years and another viewing of the film I have come to appreciate what North did with his final score.

-Erik-

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 12:15 AM   
 By:   pp312   (Member)

But to truly understand or "get" this score it needs your full attention. This isn't a score you throw on in the background.

Well, I think you've just about said it all. A film score is by definition background music. It may come to the forefront occasionally but its purpose is ultimately to support the film; if it fails to do that it fails in its purpose. To me it fails utterly in its purpose. It's annoying, irrelevant and completely misjudged, and frankly, given the number of good (and approriate) scores that studio executives have axed, I'm surprised this one got through. Could it really be that Disney executives sat around a table and nodded in sage agreement that this was the right score for their fantasy picture? Or did they say, "That's a god-awful noise, but we can't reject an Alex North score; we were lucky to get him the first place. See what the music editor can do with it. Cut out some of those squeaks and tinkles for a start...".

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 12:16 AM   
 By:   Ford A. Thaxton   (Member)

How many people have actually seen this movie in a theater?

I did...

It was quite experience.

Ford A. Thaxton

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 2:09 AM   
 By:   razorback64   (Member)

How many people have actually seen this movie in a theater?

It was one my Favourite movies of 81. I didn't know what to expect when I saw it at the local cinema and I loved it. I was sure it was going to get the oscar for Visual Effects. But it was Raiders year. The only way at the moment to get the DVD in Australia is to buy it overseas. So I have a US copy and a UK copy.

 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 2:11 AM   
 By:   AMRA75   (Member)

An incredible experience in theater at this time. The dragon was so great (in the cavern, when it deployed its wings...) . I was wondering if it was a real disney movie? Death, blood, etc... and that music so far away from the disney standards... In fact, I was only disappointing by the the young main character...
Back to the music, it was perfect for this movie.
It was agressive as the dragon was. Dark ages, dark music. The movie didn't need a kind of heroic music.. it should be stupid. North understood that, I did (and I still do like some others).

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 2:58 AM   
 By:   Les Jepson   (Member)

How many people have actually seen this movie in a theater?

I saw it on its release, and I thought that both film and score were excellent. I still think so. Disney and that particular genre suddenly grew up -- but I think a lot of people were expecting something similar in tone to THE BLACK HOLE.

 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 6:24 AM   
 By:   Mark Ford   (Member)

How many people have actually seen this movie in a theater?

Me! I was completely taken by the modernist score and thought it brought something new and exciting to a genre movie of this type. I was fairly unfamiliar with North at the time, but from that point on became very interested in his music.

It was the music and the amazing mechanical dragon effects that have stuck with me up through today. I've always had a bit of trouble with the casting of Peter MacNicol which is too bad since he's the lead. Still enjoy the film though, and for me at least, the music is still wonderfully challenging and fantastic on many levels.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 8:54 AM   
 By:   John McMasters   (Member)

I also saw “Dragonslayer” in a first-run theater in Manhattan – one that was equipped to play the “sensurround” version of the audio tracks. It was quite an experience! – the “sensurround” kicked in, if memory isn’t failing, when the dragon’s leg/claw first thumps down into the frame in pursuit of the young woman near the beginning of the film. It was a tremendous moment – so effectively set up in the film -- and the crunching smash really sent a jolt through one’s body.

The “sensurround”, as I recall, greatly enhanced the film – making it darker, scarier, and more threatening musically, thematically, visually, sonically – edging an already dark film into even darker tones. North’s music also thundered on occasion in this audio mix – and fit the film perfectly. I honestly don’t remember being aware of the score when I first saw the film – I was just aware of a wonderfully cohesive experience that left me exhilarated and thrilled. The battle on the mountain top remains one of my favorite film and music sequences of all time – I cannot imagine that sequence without North’s score weaving in and out – for me his music is magical in this film!

But just IMHO based upon my gut level responses to that first viewing – and many subsequent viewings over the years. Man oh man would I ever love to see this film again in “sensurround.” – the sound process may not have been called “sensurround” but aurally it was essentially the same process.

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 9:02 AM   
 By:   Rozsaphile   (Member)

Agree with Jeff Bond. Fine score. Effective, appropriate, interesting.

I see that we published two short reviews in Pro Musica Sana back in the day. (Miklos Rozsa wanted our Society to support all good film music, not just his own.) William Finn found it a "dazzling" score: "The half-serious, half-mocking mood of the music captures the prevalent tone of the film to perfection. . . . The end title music . . . takes the film out with a laugh, rattle, and a bang." I myself wrote contrasting DRAGONSLAYER with "last year's CARNY, spare, sour, and perfectly on-target." The new score "seems to have struck some of the SPARTACUS fire from this unpredictable composer. . . . "When an invincibly American scherzo breaks out at the close, you know that -- like it or not -- you have been in the grasp of a commanding composer" (PMS 34 [1981-82]). Two issues later came Ken Sutak's "Dragonslayer Inquiry," citing a score "as close to perfection as film music . . . has ever come." You can read all these commentaries at the Rozsa site www.miklosrozsa.org

It seems that early audiences (at least people sensitive to film music) were not at all put off by DRAGONSLAYER. They didn't even think it particularly dour or difficult.

 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 9:24 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

"The half-serious, half-mocking mood of the music captures the prevalent tone of the film to perfection.

I don't see that as a compliment. The score was at the very least half-mocking the film. Precisely the problem. It's like the composer didn't give a rats ass what he was doing. Its clear some here see his score as avant-garde. Amazing how ppl can be split so decisively on a score. LOL

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 9:36 AM   
 By:   mnrvason   (Member)

I just watched the film again recently. The effects were amazing for the time, but I found myself being distracted by the music in a very unpleasant way. Love the music outside of the film. As many have mentioned, Northwrites complex and interesting music and Dragonsalyer is no exception.

Except...

In my opinion, the music was simply inappropriate (aside from the booming menace of Vermithrax's theme). The music seemed more fit for a film from the 40's than the 80's. There was a structure to the score that just didn't work in the film for me.

I do enjoy the music, as I said, outside of the film, as a listening experience. But matched with the movie, it was simply too much of a distraction (I make the same distinction with Morricone's score to Mission To Mars...LOVE the beauty of the music...in the film, I could only ask myself repeatedly "WHAT WAS DEPALMA THINKING????"). Would rather Robbins have gone with Horner, even though Horner had not yet "arrived."

tldr; Music = 4 Stars, Film = 4 Stars, Music in Film = 2 Stars.

SheriffJoe

 
 
 Posted:   Apr 25, 2012 - 12:36 PM   
 By:   Rozsaphile   (Member)

The score was at the very least half-mocking the film. Precisely the problem.

To which scenes do you refer? The film itself was uncertain in its tonality. Where could a different musical approach have helped?

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.