|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have no guilty scores. I either like what I hear or I don't. Even if 99% of the time I dislike a composer's work, I don't dismiss anything outright. Quite right. I was about to add The Lone Ranger by Hanz Zimmer purely based on what folks said about the film, and just before I read your post thought "no dammit, I LOVE it!, why should I feel guilty?" And that goes for the movie too. Now maybe Hawk the Slayer by Harry Robertson..
|
|
|
|
|
How about John Barry´s "Star Crash"? Right now, I get the feeling that Giacchino´s "Jurassic World" might qualify - people here look down on it, while I absolutely enjoy it the more I listen to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Jerrold Immel's MEGAFORCE comes to mind, though it's not actually a "bad" score. Just a mega-funky one. Richard Einhorn's SISTER, SISTER. That one *is* a bad score, a pale Herrmann imitation. But I like it. Jay Chattaway's RED SCORPION. Anything by Jay Chattaway is bound to be a guilty pleasure, cause he's a terrible composer, really. But it's kind of groovy still. Mark Snow's JAKE SPEED - representing a truckload of hilariously antiquated 1980s electronic scores that are still fun on a non-aesthetic level. Bill Conti's THE RIGHT STUFF - just for its outrageous rip-offs. But that Tchaikovsky VC passage will no doubt give you goosebumps. Yeah, and I thought about John Barry's STAR CRASH, too - Unfortunately, his music isn't much different from what he usually did - It's just the film that's a guilty pleasure. Go figure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|