 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy, I sympathize with you, man. But people's brains collapse in these types of threads. They read the headline, then post. No regard for parameters. So you'll continue to see posts with multiple entries and scores that already have a release.
It's unfortunate, because obviously, it leads to all theses threads becoming undifferentiated and alike. "The One Unreleased score you want the most", "hoped for expansions in 2023", "the top ten scores demanding a release", it all becomes the same anonymous mass of "lists" instead of getting different threads focusing on different things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN Oliver Nelson.
At any cost.
Oh yes, "at any cost" under 6 million dollars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randy, I sympathize with you, man. But people's brains collapse in these types of threads. They read the headline, then post. No regard for parameters. So you'll continue to see posts with multiple entries and scores that already have a release.
It's unfortunate, because obviously, it leads to all theses threads becoming undifferentiated and alike. "The One Unreleased score you want the most", "hoped for expansions in 2023", "the top ten scores demanding a release", it all becomes the same anonymous mass of "lists" instead of getting different threads focusing on different things.
I really wonder what the thought process behind it is. I mean, it's a very simple and clear question. Is it really that difficult to stick to the parameters given?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Posted: |
Jan 4, 2023 - 2:52 AM
|
|
|
|
By: |
jenkwombat
(Member)
|
Randy, I sympathize with you, man. But people's brains collapse in these types of threads. They read the headline, then post. No regard for parameters. So you'll continue to see posts with multiple entries and scores that already have a release.
It's unfortunate, because obviously, it leads to all theses threads becoming undifferentiated and alike. "The One Unreleased score you want the most", "hoped for expansions in 2023", "the top ten scores demanding a release", it all becomes the same anonymous mass of "lists" instead of getting different threads focusing on different things.
I really wonder what the thought process behind it is. I mean, it's a very simple and clear question. Is it really that difficult to stick to the parameters given?
And is it really that difficult for all the anal-retentive, shrieking babies to simply just read the top title on the "offending" lists, take that as their "choice", then move on if they don't like that someone else mentioned more than one?
That's what I do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And is it really that difficult for all the anal-retentive, shrieking babies to simply just read the top title on the "offending" lists, take that as their "choice", then move on if they don't like that someone else mentioned more than one?
How ironic, coming from the person who obviously cannot move past the posts that bother him.
That's what I do.
Yeah, you just showed how well you do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miklos Rozsa "Polydor recordings" on cd....
But to be honest I lost hope....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023...the year of Charley Varrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Flight of Dragons (1982) by Maury Laws -- is the first title that did pop in my mid when I read the thread title.
Edit: so funny Hedji posted about Rankin / Bass just before me !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maurice Jarre's "Resurrection".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodbye Lover (rejected)- John Barry
Year of the Comet (rejected)-John Barry
|
|
|
|
|
|
"A Shot In The Dark".
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've come to learn not to wish for and be disappointed, rather see what comes. Bound to be something to like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
