Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 5:47 PM   
 By:   DeviantMan   (Member)

I'm disappointed that Varese wouldn't cooperate with the release of DEADLY FRIEND, but then again they issued TOP SECRET without the bonus vocal tracks.

Deadly Friend wasn't a big box office smash either, why is Varese being so stingy with other labels?

 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 6:02 PM   
 By:   Hercule Platini   (Member)

Deadly Friend wasn't a big box office smash either, why I Varese being so stingy with other labels?

Well, maybe DEADLY FRIEND is going to be the next Varese Club 1000-run.

But this is nonsense. Perseverance, press a thousand of CHINATOWN and sell 'em for $20. ($30 is a lot, especially for a score which almost no-one has ever heard.) They'll sell, even if it's to eBay speculators, especially if it's enough of a collectable quality product (eg hand numbered). If Varese can shift a thousand copies of an indifferent score like AN ALMOST PERFECT AFFAIR or THE ISLAND within a few hours, then CHINATOWN shouldn't be that much of a stretch, especially as it's a higher profile title. And it doesn't surely need to go that quickly anyway - it would be nice to have it available for a little while, give us diehard collectors some flexibility.

And presumably CHINATOWN is going to be pressed - $30 for a 28-minute CDR is a joke. But what happens if only 10 people take up the pre-order?

The more I think about this, the less I like it. Sorry.

 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 6:04 PM   
 By:   Hercule Platini   (Member)

My hat's off to Rob for trying give these to us.

*...sell...*

 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 6:13 PM   
 By:   touche   (Member)

Maybe John Morgan or David Schecter could chime in on this ridiculousness of pre-ordering a re-recording with a pricetag that far exceeds their own A+ releases, then skimps on the running time. A disturbing trend, indeed!

 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 6:15 PM   
 By:   Michael_McMahan   (Member)

>>My hat's off to Rob for trying give these to us.

*...sell...* <<

I'm not sure how to perceive this. If for some reason you imply I'm in cahoots with Perseverance, you are mistaken. I've had good experiences shopping with them and simply wish to share with anyone who is apprehensive.

 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 6:23 PM   
 By:   Hercule Platini   (Member)

>>My hat's off to Rob for trying give these to us.

*...sell...* <<

I'm not sure how to perceive this. If for some reason you imply I'm in cahoots with Perseverance, you are mistaken. I've had good experiences shopping with them and simply wish to share with anyone who is apprehensive.



Nope. Perseverance aren't giving these to us, they're selling them. That was all. No implications intended.

 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 6:27 PM   
 By:   Michael_McMahan   (Member)

OK, I getchya.

 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 6:29 PM   
 By:   franz_conrad   (Member)

Another point to consider. Since when has this message board been used to solicite the sale of 'promos' (or bootlegs?) which are presumably unlicensed by their prospective rights holders?

Sheriff? Anyone?


To be fair, PERSERVERANCE didn't start this thread, but appeared to answer the questions we were already asking.

 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 6:32 PM   
 By:   Ford A. Thaxton   (Member)

Another point to consider. Since when has this message board been used to solicite the sale of 'promos' (or bootlegs?) which are presumably unlicensed by their prospective rights holders?

Sheriff? Anyone?



This appears was posted by SHERIFF JOE on the TRADING POST section of this site regarding promos and alike




http://www.filmscoremonthly.com/board/posts.asp?threadID=32326&forumID=2

Posted: Jan. 19, 2006 - 10:18 PM / IP: 68.8.21.12
By: SheriffJoe (Administrator)

Please, don't sell your bootlegs. Bootlegs, for the uninitiated, include promos.

Promos are NOT TO BE SOLD. They are not pressed for sale and the composer does not get anything for his work. In fact, the only person who gets money for selling a promo is the person selling it.

It is illegal to sell promos.

In the future, anyone attempting to sell promos and other bootleg discs here at FSM will get a public warning, the thread will be DELETED and then the poster will be permanantly banned.

End of notification.

SheriffJoe



Now if this applies on this board to everyone is a question for Sheriff to answer.



Ford A. Thaxton


 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 7:23 PM   
 By:   Thor   (Member)

The $10 deposit thing sounds like a really bad business idea. I'll be surprised if a significant number of people take you up on it.

I realize that this is a tough business and that you want to recoup your costs, but I don't think this is the way to do it. As has been previously mentioned: Press the CD (in a given number) and sell it for $20, like other specialty labels.

 
 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 8:57 PM   
 By:   Spymaster   (Member)

The $10 deposit thing sounds like a really bad business idea. I'll be surprised if a significant number of people take you up on it.

I realize that this is a tough business and that you want to recoup your costs, but I don't think this is the way to do it. As has been previously mentioned: Press the CD (in a given number) and sell it for $20, like other specialty labels.


Agreed.

 
 Posted:   May 29, 2006 - 10:46 PM   
 By:   SBD   (Member)

Perserverance, eh? So...what's the scoop on "Remo Williams", or is that hush-hush?

 
 
 Posted:   May 30, 2006 - 9:15 AM   
 By:   moviescore   (Member)

Oh? Well was the orchestral score an alternate to the electronic cues or an addition to them? Just what exactly is gonna be on this CD?

This is what Charles Bernstein wrote to me when I asked him about it a couple of years ago:

"Those were orchestral scores in the films (with a few synth effects and additions) but released on LP as total synth versions for the usual unfortunate financial reasons. I still have reel to reel tapes of the orchestral
sessions."

Those = Deadly Friend and April Fool's Day!

mikael

 
 Posted:   May 30, 2006 - 12:32 PM   
 By:   SheriffJoe   (Member)

This is very interesting and I will have to check with Lukas on this to make sure it is something he wants here. Until I get an answer (or the end of the day draws nigh), I will leave it here (although it belongs in the trading post folder...NOT in the general duscussion folder).

SheriffJoe

 
 Posted:   May 30, 2006 - 1:50 PM   
 By:   spielboy   (Member)

Perserverance, eh? So...what's the scoop on "Remo Williams", or is that hush-hush?

in that same email there is a list of their releases (some of them with the "xxx units left" warning) and REMO is :

PRD 010 Remo Williams by Craig Safan

This long-awaited release of the classic film score from the composer of "The Last Starfighter" is sure to be a hit. Reserve your copies as this title is limited to 3,000 units. Almost 70 minutes of music.

price $19, release date June 20, 2006

 
 
 Posted:   May 30, 2006 - 2:08 PM   
 By:   Spymaster   (Member)

This long-awaited release of the classic film score from the composer of "The Last Starfighter" is sure to be a hit. Reserve your copies as this title is limited to 3,000 units. Almost 70 minutes of music.

price $19, release date June 20, 2006


Their site suggests that Remo is taken from a DAT provided by the composer. That sounds extremely... well... "unusual" to me. Surely the master tapes must still be around?

How is this going to compare to Intrada's previous release of this score?

John

 
 
 Posted:   May 30, 2006 - 2:16 PM   
 By:   Roger Feigelson   (Member)

Isn't this the same label that when they released LOCH NESS, claimed it was limited to 1000 units. Then they said they were running out so buy quickly. Shortly after, the story changed from it being a 1000 pressing run to they were only referring to the first pressing of 1000.

I'm not sure what this label's strategy is.

 
 Posted:   May 30, 2006 - 2:21 PM   
 By:   Dana Wilcox   (Member)

Release Rosenman's score for the original SYBIL legitimately and I might consider forking over a $10 deposit. All of the above is horsepucky (something I agree with Ford Thaxton about for a change) and anyone who prepays anything for these bootleg/promos deserves to be swindled.

 
 
 Posted:   May 30, 2006 - 9:12 PM   
 By:   Spymaster   (Member)

"Those were orchestral scores in the films (with a few synth effects and additions) but released on LP as total synth versions for the usual unfortunate financial reasons. I still have reel to reel tapes of the orchestral sessions."
mikael


Ok, in that case my next question is this: will this "orchestral recording" include the "synth effects and additions" that were heard in the film mix, or will they ONLY be the orchestral tracks?

John

 
 
 Posted:   May 31, 2006 - 12:26 AM   
 By:   Ford A. Thaxton   (Member)

Release Rosenman's score for the original SYBIL legitimately and I might consider forking over a $10 deposit. All of the above is horsepucky (something I agree with Ford Thaxton about for a change) and anyone who prepays anything for these bootleg/promos deserves to be swindled.

FYI, the only thing I commented on was the policy as stated by Sheriff Joe, NOTHING MORE.


I know the owner of this label, he's a nice guy, taking PREORDERS is one thing, but making a downpayment doesn't seem right for some reason.

IMHO of course.


Ford A. Thaxton

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.