Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 7:29 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

I'm watching right now. So far, I'd say it looks great, but it's very same ol' same, retro almost. Not what I want.

 
 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 7:34 PM   
 By:   Christopher Kinsinger   (Member)

As a great lover of the (original) Star Trek, I am very interested to know how this new program is going.

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 7:40 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

As a great lover of the (original) Star Trek, I am very interested to know how this new program is going.

I think you'd love it.

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 7:43 PM   
 By:   johnjohnson   (Member)

http://ew.com/tv/2017/09/24/star-trek-discovery-opening-credits/

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 8:01 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Short answer, it's was a disgrace. Betraying everything Star Trek.

Production wise, not so little nit picks-

(a) Sets are way to dark. It was hard to make anything out.
(b) Hate the fast cuts. Annoying as hell. Don't help sets are so dark.
(c) Script seemed to be written for 8 year old's. The dialog was atrocious.
(d) Terrible acting all around.

Edit:

(e) Non-distinctive characters. No personalty.
(f) Paper thin plot and motivations.
(g) Another new Trek that fucks over the Vulcan's. First we wipe then out, now we turn them into neocons.

 
 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 8:04 PM   
 By:   Christopher Kinsinger   (Member)

Poor script...Bad acting....

Sounds like there is room for improvement.

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 8:11 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

Well, the first episode is over. I liked it, but I wish they'd done something different. This first season, if there is another, will be about a war with the Klingons. It all looks great, very well mounted, but very familiar.

I won't watch the rest of the show until the entire season can be binge watched, then I'll subscribe to CBS All Access for one month.

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 8:17 PM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

Poor script...Bad acting....

Sounds like there is room for improvement.


He's being hyper-critical. It was hardly a disgrace, but it does need to evolve.

One thing I found funny was all the executive producers listed in the main credits.

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 9:11 PM   
 By:   LordDalek   (Member)

This was not the worst premiere Star Trek has ever had...but LORD was it up there.

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 10:19 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

One thing I found funny was all the executive producers listed in the main credits.

This was not the worst premiere Star Trek has ever had...but LORD was it up there.


Never have, "Made By Committee" been more obvious.

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 10:36 PM   
 By:   Sirusjr   (Member)

My husband and I thought both of the episodes were engaging and exciting almost through and through. Though we are new to the Star Trek series as opposed to the films. I'm much more hooked here than I am with The Orville. The two episodes shown tonight have much more feel of propelling towards something imminent than The Orville.

 
 Posted:   Sep 24, 2017 - 11:42 PM   
 By:   ZapBrannigan   (Member)

I thought this first episode came to a dead stop whenever the Klingons were speaking. The Klingons were both grotesque and boring, a bad combination. But I liked most of the rest of it. And the whole jetpack "Spock Walk" scene was the coolest thing Star Trek has done in a LONG time. Sadly, the rest of it is behind a paywall, so I'm out.

 
 Posted:   Sep 25, 2017 - 4:09 AM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

I canceled my CBS Now account before I could finish the second episode.

It's Star Trek for the Fast & The Furious crowd. Unremitting garbage, complete with dull music and no characterization.

Pass.

 
 Posted:   Sep 25, 2017 - 5:51 AM   
 By:   LordDalek   (Member)

One thing I found funny was all the executive producers listed in the main credits.

This was not the worst premiere Star Trek has ever had...but LORD was it up there.


Never have, "Made By Committee" been more obvious.


If "By Committee" you mean "Akiva Goldsman".

....which is 10x worse TBQH.

 
 Posted:   Sep 25, 2017 - 6:21 AM   
 By:   mastadge   (Member)

I thought this first episode came to a dead stop whenever the Klingons were speaking.

They seemed to speak very slowly.

 
 Posted:   Sep 25, 2017 - 6:39 AM   
 By:   RoryR   (Member)

I thought this first episode came to a dead stop whenever the Klingons were speaking. The Klingons were both grotesque and boring, a bad combination. But I liked most of the rest of it. And the whole jetpack "Spock Walk" scene was the coolest thing Star Trek has done in a LONG time. Sadly, the rest of it is behind a paywall, so I'm out.

What does "behind a paywall" mean?

Anyway, the Klingons were the worst part, which is not good given that it appears the entire season will involve them. The Klingons again? This is the retro element I'm talking about. Can't Star Trek evolve beyond this? For a franchise that invented the Vulcans, too much of ST is amazingly illogical, and among the most illogical is the Klingons. They are a silly concept, something akin to pulp SF like Flash Gordon's Ming the Merciless. The Klingons should have been abandoned right after they first appeared in TOS. In "Errand of Mercy" that creatures that were "pure energy" were far more interesting.

I like Star Trek, but what I don't like about the franchise is how it keeps chasing its own tail.

 
 Posted:   Sep 25, 2017 - 7:18 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

The Klingon's are indeed silly, one-dimensional, cartoonish characters. Haven't liked them since TOS.

 
 Posted:   Sep 25, 2017 - 7:20 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

I thought this first episode came to a dead stop whenever the Klingons were speaking.

They seemed to speak very slowly.


And move very slowly. They're so unpractical in concept. Especially for a "warrior" race.

 
 Posted:   Sep 25, 2017 - 11:41 AM   
 By:   CindyLover   (Member)

What does "behind a paywall" mean?

It means that you can't legally watch the series anywhere without paying for it; it's available on CBS All Access in the US, Bell Media-owned outlets in Canada, and Netflix everywhere else after its American debut. (Which is tough luck for Sky in the UK.)

 
 Posted:   Sep 25, 2017 - 11:47 AM   
 By:   Khan   (Member)


What does "behind a paywall" mean?


Means he has to pay for CBS All Access to watch the rest of it. Aka behind a paywall.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.