Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 Posted:   Oct 3, 2019 - 9:51 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

On a somewhat related note...
There has been a trend lately to releasing expanded editions of scores in which the original album presentation is included as supplementary material.
I think this is a fabulous thing and I hope it continues.
It may increase the price point a bit but it's like having the best of both worlds.


I'd still rather put the first group in prison



Make sure there is room in there for Trekkies.
It's the only way to punish then AND still keep them safe from The Wrath Of Thor.


Trekkies don't get to live.
Sorry.

 
 Posted:   Oct 3, 2019 - 10:12 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Trekkies don't get to live.
Sorry.



YOU ARE NOT OF THE BODY!

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 3, 2019 - 11:20 PM   
 By:   haineshisway   (Member)

I don't do crossfades at all.

Why not? They can work very well if the producer has ears and taste.


Well, why? Why do a crossfade. Explain to me what is gained. One cue ends naturally, the next begins naturally - what you do is keep the room ambience consistent, and as long as the combined cues make musical sense, it's very natural. I don't find crossfading natural at all, that is, if you understand what a crossfade actually is and does.


I don't like it when producers allow the final notes of a bunch of short cues to slowly decay into an inaudible nothingness. It slows down the momentum. It's like being in bumper-to-bumper traffic.

I tightened up the film versions of Last Tango, Chinatown, and several Joel McNeely Herrmanns, and I like my versions much better than the released versions.


But you like when the music is ending and then the start of the incoming cue plays over that? Bully for you. I don't know what other producers do - I'm speaking for myself. When I combine cues no one knows it because Mr. James Nelson is rather artful about it.

 
 Posted:   Oct 3, 2019 - 11:23 PM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

Trekkies don't get to live.
Sorry.



YOU ARE NOT OF THE BODY!


Only fans of TOS get to live.
TNGers are toast.

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 12:22 AM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Here's another odd thing that popped into my head and it has to do with the Star Wars discs I mentioned earlier.

The 1993 Arista set had no qualms about giving us the short tracks from ROTJ when they were available.
But the 1997 RCA's blended them into 3 big medleys called "The Battle Of Endor I, II & III".
Here's the odd part for me: the liner notes preface the music by saying "'The Battle Of Endor I' marks the beginning of a remarkable feat by Williams and the LSO--over 30 minutes of continuous action music for the climax of the trilogy.".
The implication is that Williams recorded it as one long continuous piece.
But people who don't own the Arista box wouldn't know that it wasn't recorded that way--so, in a sense, it's a bit of revisionist history.
I don't understand how or why the presentation philosophy changed between 1993 and 1997.
It probably seemed like an insignificant editorial decision at the time (and in many ways it still is), but why change the presentation at all if it was good enough in 1993?

As I was typing this it occurred to me that this particular example must surely have been mentioned here before by some folks--it seems familiar.
And if that's the case, please excuse the redundancy.

It bears repeating that the Arista box is GOLD.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 5:16 AM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

But you like when the music is ending and then the start of the incoming cue plays over that? Bully for you. I don't know what other producers do - I'm speaking for myself. When I combine cues no one knows it because Mr. James Nelson is rather artful about it.

That depends on lots of factors, including the length of the crossfade, the keys of the tracks in question, and the instrumentation.

On "Charade," I have the opening percussion of the main title start with the final chord of the logo. There is no harmonic clash, and the final chord of the logo is out before the melody of the main title comes in. That would be an extreme example of a longer crossfade, but it works very well for me.

Many of the other crossfades I do are extremely short - fractions of a second - but they nevertheless help to provide continuity.

What drives me crazy is when several seconds of silence are embedded into the ends of very short tracks, thus slowing down the momentum.

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 6:24 AM   
 By:   Shaun Rutherford   (Member)

But you like when the music is ending and then the start of the incoming cue plays over that? Bully for you. I don't know what other producers do - I'm speaking for myself. When I combine cues no one knows it because Mr. James Nelson is rather artful about it.

That depends on lots of factors, including the length of the crossfade, the keys of the tracks in question, and the instrumentation.

On "Charade," I have the opening percussion of the main title start with the final chord of the logo. There is no harmonic clash, and the final chord of the logo is out before the melody of the main title comes in. That would be an extreme example of a longer crossfade, but it works very well for me.

Many of the other crossfades I do are extremely short - fractions of a second - but they nevertheless help to provide continuity.

What drives me crazy is when several seconds of silence are embedded into the ends of very short tracks, thus slowing down the momentum.


With all due respect, that's not a great idea for a combined cue! That opening of the Charade main title is so iconic! Nothing should be before it.

I can't remember now if Bruce did a crossfade on the two prom cues from Carrie, but putting them in the same track definitely wasn't for me. I just used the separate album tracks there when I converted them to digital.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 6:28 AM   
 By:   OnyaBirri   (Member)

With all due respect, that's not a great idea for a combined cue! That opening of the Charade main title is so iconic! Nothing should be before it.

That is for the listener to decide. I don't tell you or Marcato how to listen to music, and in an ideal world, that should work both ways.

Incidentally, the logo appears before the main title on the existing CD.

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 6:38 AM   
 By:   Nicolai P. Zwar   (Member)


Well, why? Why do a crossfade. Explain to me what is gained.


When it's done well, excellent listening arrangements, like the Suite from "Boys from Brazil" by Jerry Goldsmith, which crossfades multiple cues into one larger, 20-minute coherent cue.

Sometimes cues are designed to be listened to as one larger cue, even if they are separated in a movie, sometimes not. I don't think cues should be forcibly put together, but I also don't think they should be forcibly kept apart. Goldsmith excellently combined some cues for his FIRST BLOOD release, too.

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 7:24 AM   
 By:   Shaun Rutherford   (Member)

With all due respect, that's not a great idea for a combined cue! That opening of the Charade main title is so iconic! Nothing should be before it.

That is for the listener to decide. I don't tell you or Marcato how to listen to music, and in an ideal world, that should work both ways.

Incidentally, the logo appears before the main title on the existing CD.


Not in the same track!

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 9:39 AM   
 By:   Spymaster   (Member)

Worst offenders for me:

High Road To China (BSX)
The Living Daylights (Ryko)
For Your Eyes Only (Ryko)
The Sum Of All Fears (La-La Land)

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 10:11 AM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

Two cues that should have been combined on.the expanded STV:
the two pre credits pieced. Stupid that they aren't!

Thank God Lukas produced DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER and not a C & C Crazy or an ECS.
1. Gunbarrel/007 in Japan
2. 007 in Cairo
3.007 in France
4. 007 in South America
5. Death of Blofeld
6. Title song

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 10:13 AM   
 By:   Justin Boggan   (Member)

Thank goodness those were combined!

If anything, in my personal opinion, I would have relegated those to bonus cues for a better listening experience.

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 11:37 AM   
 By:   Shaun Rutherford   (Member)

Worst offenders for me:

The Sum Of All Fears (La-La Land)


I think this is a Goldwasser thing. I don't have all of the albums he's produced, but every one I do have has issues with combining cues in a seemingly arbitrary manner. I'm glad that Paramount legal finally started to demand that a card be included in all the albums he's produced that explains that Dan was recently diagnosed as "deaf his whole entire life" and that we should take this into account before listening to the contents of the compact disc we have purchased.

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 11:58 AM   
 By:   'Lenny Bruce' Marshall   (Member)

Worst offenders for me:

The Sum Of All Fears (La-La Land)


I think this is a Goldwasser thing. I don't have all of the albums he's produced, but every one I do have has issues with combining cues in a seemingly arbitrary manner. I'm glad that Paramount legal finally started to demand that a card be included in all the albums he's produced that explains that Dan was recently diagnosed as "deaf his whole entire life" and that we should take this into account before listening to the contents of the compact disc we have purchased.


The Rutherford Maligning

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 12:11 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

Here's another example of the "best of both worlds" thing I mentioned previously:



It's a brief score. The album contains 20 relatively short tracks.
The 21st track is a suite blending all of them together.
Whether one thinks the suite works or not is almost besides the point, because the producers gave us both listening options.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 12:16 PM   
 By:   Marcato   (Member)

OnYa. As i have Said before. You have a problem if you feel taken out when short cues are separated by silence

The Music is short and are supposed to be that


You can combine it in your home studio

 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 12:20 PM   
 By:   Octoberman   (Member)

One more example before I call it quits--a far more well-known one:

The 1997 Varese edition gave us "Escape" material as a supplement.
The cues were blended into a suite.




In 2009, Varese gave "Escape" its own release--separate cues.




A choice of presentations--the best way to go.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 12:49 PM   
 By:   haineshisway   (Member)


Well, why? Why do a crossfade. Explain to me what is gained.


When it's done well, excellent listening arrangements, like the Suite from "Boys from Brazil" by Jerry Goldsmith, which crossfades multiple cues into one larger, 20-minute coherent cue.

Sometimes cues are designed to be listened to as one larger cue, even if they are separated in a movie, sometimes not. I don't think cues should be forcibly put together, but I also don't think they should be forcibly kept apart. Goldsmith excellently combined some cues for his FIRST BLOOD release, too.


I think perhaps the use of the word "crossfade" is being not understood. A crossfade is a very specific thing - combining cues into a suite of cues is something wholly other - we've done it several times, especially if I have alternates - in fact, I love doing that if it works and makes sense. I think I did it on Red.

 
 
 Posted:   Oct 4, 2019 - 3:21 PM   
 By:   Marcato   (Member)


Well, why? Why do a crossfade. Explain to me what is gained.


When it's done well, excellent listening arrangements, like the Suite from "Boys from Brazil" by Jerry Goldsmith, which crossfades multiple cues into one larger, 20-minute coherent cue.

Sometimes cues are designed to be listened to as one larger cue, even if they are separated in a movie, sometimes not. I don't think cues should be forcibly put together, but I also don't think they should be forcibly kept apart. Goldsmith excellently combined some cues for his FIRST BLOOD release, too.


I think perhaps the use of the word "crossfade" is being not understood. A crossfade is a very specific thing - combining cues into a suite of cues is something wholly other - we've done it several times, especially if I have alternates - in fact, I love doing that if it works and makes sense. I think I did it on Red.




I don’t like Them at all if they were not meant to be or appear as such in the film. They should always be separated - people can combine Them at home OR ‘best of both words’ - and that would be an opputinity with scores only running about 30-40 minuttes



Since people are not sure about cross-fade i’ll go make a video that Will explain - when i can inseart time in-between my medical studies

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.