Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   May 18, 2022 - 11:15 AM   
 By:   TheAvenger   (Member)


Kennedy is a fraud who hasn't got a clue what she's doing.
I'm amazed she's clung on to her position, in the wake of the cluster fuck that became the franchise.


The problem is that Kennedy is and always has been a producer, rather than being someone with a creative background who has fallen into producing like Lucas. She’s a business woman, probably very good at counting beans, getting deals done and hiring people. But the new trilogy - or any film series - needs someone in charge who is creative and understands narrative and story telling and that isn’t her.

The fact that the trilogy was shaped as it went rather than following a map from day one was a major problem. As a result of that, Last Jedi painted the franchise into a corner which, because there was no arc in place, the next director (who is not a very good writer anyway) couldn’t get out of so he just walked through the paint leaving an unholy mess. This wouldn’t have happened if they had a direction plotted from the start with someone capable of steering the ship from the first film to the last. The fact Kennedy didn’t realise this shows she wasn’t the right person for the job.

 
 Posted:   May 18, 2022 - 11:37 AM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)

Honestly, George Lucas didn't have his original trilogy all mapped out either. MAYBE some broad strokes, but Return of the Jedi feels like a quick and dirty "out of the corner paint sloshing" as well. It's nearly as lazy in its storytelling as RoS. Just so happens a third if it is great where none of RoS is any good.

Well. Okay, the music is great.

The goodwill and popularity of the Star Wars franchise comes from two movies. And that's pretty much it.

 
 
 Posted:   May 18, 2022 - 12:29 PM   
 By:   TheAvenger   (Member)

Honestly, George Lucas didn't have his original trilogy all mapped out either. MAYBE some broad strokes, but Return of the Jedi feels like a quick and dirty "out of the corner paint sloshing" as well. It's nearly as lazy in its storytelling as RoS. Just so happens a third if it is great where none of RoS is any good.

Well. Okay, the music is great.

The goodwill and popularity of the Star Wars franchise comes from two movies. And that's pretty much it.


Film making was very different in the 70s. Pre-planned trilogies simply didn’t exist then. And I agree with you about ROTJ, although by comparison to the last trilogy it’s a work of art.

By the time Lucas got into the 2nd trilogy he DID have that mapped out, and some of it harked back to things he had said decades before.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m no lover of the prequels but at least they were broadly plotted out. The last three movies just looked like they were made up on the set during shooting.



 
 Posted:   May 18, 2022 - 2:21 PM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)


Film making was very different in the 70s. Pre-planned trilogies simply didn’t exist then. And I agree with you about ROTJ, although by comparison to the last trilogy it’s a work of art.

By the time Lucas got into the 2nd trilogy he DID have that mapped out, and some of it harked back to things he had said decades before.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m no lover of the prequels but at least they were broadly plotted out. The last three movies just looked like they were made up on the set during shooting.


I get that but once Empire was in production, and knowing it was ending on an unresolved note, you'd think he'd have it a little better planned. "Oh, the girl Luke's been crushing on and who finally kissed him? Let's make her his sister. Oh, the whole Vader killed your father bit? We can explain that as being true...from a certain point of view. Oh, Luke needs more training. Nope, Yoda's fine with what he knows." Etc.

The prequels were plotted but thinly as well as broadly, with one film's worth of story stretched over three. And as much as Lucas wanted to tie his films together, he had to go back to the originals and make edits to have them fit better. Which sucked.

I - enjoy - ROTJ for the most part and even Episode 3 is an okay piece of entertainment, I actually really like The Last Jedi because - FINALLY - someone was taking risks again. I didn't like all of the decisions but that film kept me on my toes throughout and I respected the desire to subvert expectations and make a FILM instead of just another piece of merch.

The problem with the SW movies is that they don't let the main villains end as villains. This is discounting Palpatine who was created because Vader needed to be redeemed in the final chapter of the original trilogy. Kylo Ren had to be redeemed so they brought back Palpatine - IN THE TEXT CRAWL. That movie is actually so lazy it's insulting.

 
 Posted:   May 18, 2022 - 8:15 PM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)


Film making was very different in the 70s. Pre-planned trilogies simply didn’t exist then. And I agree with you about ROTJ, although by comparison to the last trilogy it’s a work of art.

By the time Lucas got into the 2nd trilogy he DID have that mapped out, and some of it harked back to things he had said decades before.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m no lover of the prequels but at least they were broadly plotted out. The last three movies just looked like they were made up on the set during shooting.


I get that but once Empire was in production, and knowing it was ending on an unresolved note, you'd think he'd have it a little better planned. "Oh, the girl Luke's been crushing on and who finally kissed him? Let's make her his sister. Oh, the whole Vader killed your father bit? We can explain that as being true...from a certain point of view. Oh, Luke needs more training. Nope, Yoda's fine with what he knows." Etc.

The prequels were plotted but thinly as well as broadly, with one film's worth of story stretched over three. And as much as Lucas wanted to tie his films together, he had to go back to the originals and make edits to have them fit better. Which sucked.

I - enjoy - ROTJ for the most part and even Episode 3 is an okay piece of entertainment, I actually really like The Last Jedi because - FINALLY - someone was taking risks again. I didn't like all of the decisions but that film kept me on my toes throughout and I respected the desire to subvert expectations and make a FILM instead of just another piece of merch.

The problem with the SW movies is that they don't let the main villains end as villains. This is discounting Palpatine who was created because Vader needed to be redeemed in the final chapter of the original trilogy. Kylo Ren had to be redeemed so they brought back Palpatine - IN THE TEXT CRAWL. That movie is actually so lazy it's insulting.


When Luke said, "Then this droid belongs to you." in Star Wars Obi Wan said, "I don't remember ever owning a droid." Then the prequels happened! He did a lot of revisionists in the original 6 films.

 
 Posted:   May 19, 2022 - 8:05 AM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

And The Last Jedi...that was a MUCH better film than anyone wants to publicly admit.

I honestly would drag Rian Johnson out into the street and beat him in the head with a tire iron in front of his mother and mine if given half a chance. There was nothing good about it or him.

 
 Posted:   May 19, 2022 - 8:33 AM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)

And The Last Jedi...that was a MUCH better film than anyone wants to publicly admit.

I honestly would drag Rian Johnson out into the street and beat him in the head with a tire iron in front of his mother and mine if given half a chance. There was nothing good about it or him.


Well...I gotta say...no movie has ever wanted me to physically beat someone. I guess I won't be saying how much I enjoyed Knives Out then...

 
 Posted:   May 19, 2022 - 9:05 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

And The Last Jedi...that was a MUCH better film than anyone wants to publicly admit.

I honestly would drag Rian Johnson out into the street and beat him in the head with a tire iron in front of his mother and mine if given half a chance. There was nothing good about it or him.


The humanist in you is really showing.

 
 Posted:   May 19, 2022 - 9:47 AM   
 By:   LeHah   (Member)

And The Last Jedi...that was a MUCH better film than anyone wants to publicly admit.

I honestly would drag Rian Johnson out into the street and beat him in the head with a tire iron in front of his mother and mine if given half a chance. There was nothing good about it or him.

Well...I gotta say...no movie has ever wanted me to physically beat someone


My reaction to Prometheus was to draw a picture of myself sneaking up behind Ridley Scott and about to crack him with a folding trench shovel. And I didn't even *pay* to see that crap.

 
 
 Posted:   May 20, 2022 - 12:19 AM   
 By:   Rick15   (Member)

And The Last Jedi...that was a MUCH better film than anyone wants to publicly admit.

I honestly would drag Rian Johnson out into the street and beat him in the head with a tire iron in front of his mother and mine if given half a chance. There was nothing good about it or him.


Well...I gotta say...no movie has ever wanted me to physically beat someone. I guess I won't be saying how much I enjoyed Knives Out then...


Normally I read your opinions of films and find your thoughts are very aligned to mine.

However, for The Last Jedi and Knives Out, it seems we are poles apart.

Nothing in that except - each to their own I guess.

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2022 - 7:32 AM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)



Normally I read your opinions of films and find your thoughts are very aligned to mine.

However, for The Last Jedi and Knives Out, it seems we are poles apart.


Well, in what way? I mean, lots of films by the same director are radically different in style, story, pacing, quality and whatever and I can enjoy them. Big difference between Superman and Lethal Weapon and I love them both.

And I generally enjoy a TON of movies most people loathe. That's just how I roll... big grin

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2022 - 7:35 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)

Ummm... Pirates Of The Caribbean without Depp as Sparrow?!? No... that's like having Peter Falk in his prime and not going with him for Columbo.

I suppose a **different** story with a pirate theme is fine, but, my God, PotC *is* Depp, isn't it?


I wish they had got rid of Depp after the first movie. Jack Sparrow was a terrific character in Curse of the Black Pearl but just became increasingly annoying from the second movie onwards.


Not that I wish they got rid of him but I agree his shtick got old really fast. I would wager a bet he was acting in the first film, while he was really drunk and/or drugged up during the other films.

 
 Posted:   May 20, 2022 - 7:36 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)



Normally I read your opinions of films and find your thoughts are very aligned to mine.

However, for The Last Jedi and Knives Out, it seems we are poles apart.


Well, in what way? I mean, lots of films by the same director are radically different in style, story, pacing, quality and whatever and I can enjoy them. Big difference between Superman and Lethal Weapon and I love them both.

And I generally enjoy a TON of movies most people loathe. That's just how I roll... big grin


I generally dislike the more popular films while the films I really enjoy I feel are underappreciated or unfairly criticized compared to what everyone else raves about.

 
 
 Posted:   May 21, 2022 - 1:51 AM   
 By:   Rick15   (Member)



Normally I read your opinions of films and find your thoughts are very aligned to mine.

However, for The Last Jedi and Knives Out, it seems we are poles apart.


Well, in what way? I mean, lots of films by the same director are radically different in style, story, pacing, quality and whatever and I can enjoy them.


I guess Rian’s style leaves me cold.

For me, The Last Jedi wasn’t just a poor Star Wars movie but also a poor movie. It was dull, pacing was terrible, plot points and characters didn’t make sense......did I mention that it was dull?

Knives out - was lifeless and dull. It’s been a long time since I saw it and I have no desire to sit through it again, but i remember seeing it in the cinema and being so bored that I wanted to fall asleep. Apparently there is a sequel being made, so some people liked it I guess.

I saw Knives Out because I hated The Last Jedi with a passion and wanted to see what Rian could do outside of the Star Wars universe. I saw more of the same.

This is all simply my opinion of course.

 
 
 Posted:   May 21, 2022 - 3:45 AM   
 By:   Moonlit   (Member)



Normally I read your opinions of films and find your thoughts are very aligned to mine.

However, for The Last Jedi and Knives Out, it seems we are poles apart.


Well, in what way? I mean, lots of films by the same director are radically different in style, story, pacing, quality and whatever and I can enjoy them.


I guess Rian’s style leaves me cold.

For me, The Last Jedi wasn’t just a poor Star Wars movie but also a poor movie. It was dull, pacing was terrible, plot points and characters didn’t make sense......did I mention that it was dull?

Knives out - was lifeless and dull. It’s been a long time since I saw it and I have no desire to sit through it again, but i remember seeing it in the cinema and being so bored that I wanted to fall asleep. Apparently there is a sequel being made, so some people liked it I guess.

I saw Knives Out because I hated The Last Jedi with a passion and wanted to see what Rian could do outside of the Star Wars universe. I saw more of the same.

This is all simply my opinion of course.


I'd say Knives Out was better than Last Jedi (though not great), and Brick towers over everything else he's done.

It continues to baffle me how the trilogy or Solo get all the talk but Rogue One was easily the best of the newish ones. Sure, it didn't have a star cast, but it made more sense within the SW universe without photocopying ANH like Force Awakens did. Which is rather sad when you consider FA might be the least worse in the trilogy. 40 years on since the original trilogy and the franchise still really hasn't accomplished anything.

 
 
 Posted:   May 21, 2022 - 7:29 AM   
 By:   Moonlit   (Member)

I'm sorry for playing devil's advocate but do have to ask what this franchise has done? Nothing that I can see. Books, spinoffs etc I can see but the films not much IMO. However, they've produced a lot of great material in reviews on why they don't work.

 
 Posted:   May 21, 2022 - 7:49 AM   
 By:   Solium   (Member)



Normally I read your opinions of films and find your thoughts are very aligned to mine.

However, for The Last Jedi and Knives Out, it seems we are poles apart.


Well, in what way? I mean, lots of films by the same director are radically different in style, story, pacing, quality and whatever and I can enjoy them.


I guess Rian’s style leaves me cold.

For me, The Last Jedi wasn’t just a poor Star Wars movie but also a poor movie. It was dull, pacing was terrible, plot points and characters didn’t make sense......did I mention that it was dull?

Knives out - was lifeless and dull. It’s been a long time since I saw it and I have no desire to sit through it again, but i remember seeing it in the cinema and being so bored that I wanted to fall asleep. Apparently there is a sequel being made, so some people liked it I guess.

I saw Knives Out because I hated The Last Jedi with a passion and wanted to see what Rian could do outside of the Star Wars universe. I saw more of the same.

This is all simply my opinion of course.


I'd say Knives Out was better than Last Jedi (though not great), and Brick towers over everything else he's done.

It continues to baffle me how the trilogy or Solo get all the talk but Rogue One was easily the best of the newish ones. Sure, it didn't have a star cast, but it made more sense within the SW universe without photocopying ANH like Force Awakens did. Which is rather sad when you consider FA might be the least worse in the trilogy. 40 years on since the original trilogy and the franchise still really hasn't accomplished anything.


Agree on the Disney trilogy regurgitating what was done before but Rogue One was awful too. They built a whole film around a throw away line in Star Wars. The lead was as bland as Rey and the rest of the cast were a bunch of weirdo's with accents I could barely understand. The visuals were dark and muddy. I'll go to my dying grave saying Star Wars films should open with a text crawl. It's what makes it "Star Wars". (Though not one as badly written as Rise of Skywalker.)

 
 
 Posted:   May 21, 2022 - 9:05 AM   
 By:   Moonlit   (Member)



Normally I read your opinions of films and find your thoughts are very aligned to mine.

However, for The Last Jedi and Knives Out, it seems we are poles apart.


Well, in what way? I mean, lots of films by the same director are radically different in style, story, pacing, quality and whatever and I can enjoy them.


I guess Rian’s style leaves me cold.

For me, The Last Jedi wasn’t just a poor Star Wars movie but also a poor movie. It was dull, pacing was terrible, plot points and characters didn’t make sense......did I mention that it was dull?

Knives out - was lifeless and dull. It’s been a long time since I saw it and I have no desire to sit through it again, but i remember seeing it in the cinema and being so bored that I wanted to fall asleep. Apparently there is a sequel being made, so some people liked it I guess.

I saw Knives Out because I hated The Last Jedi with a passion and wanted to see what Rian could do outside of the Star Wars universe. I saw more of the same.

This is all simply my opinion of course.


I'd say Knives Out was better than Last Jedi (though not great), and Brick towers over everything else he's done.

It continues to baffle me how the trilogy or Solo get all the talk but Rogue One was easily the best of the newish ones. Sure, it didn't have a star cast, but it made more sense within the SW universe without photocopying ANH like Force Awakens did. Which is rather sad when you consider FA might be the least worse in the trilogy. 40 years on since the original trilogy and the franchise still really hasn't accomplished anything.


Agree on the Disney trilogy regurgitating what was done before but Rogue One was awful too. They built a whole film around a throw away line in Star Wars. The lead was as bland as Rey and the rest of the cast were a bunch of weirdo's with accents I could barely understand. The visuals were dark and muddy. I'll go to my dying grave saying Star Wars films should open with a text crawl. It's what makes it "Star Wars". (Though not one as badly written as Rise of Skywalker.)


C'mon, people. Does anyone really look at the prequels and go 'oh them were some fine films!' Silly imo. I thought Mr. Plinkett did a superb comedic job of debunking them.

Even if RO is as bad as the Disney trilogy, about the only difference I can see is maybe the acting was better in the trilogy minus Rey. I haven't seen ROS, so I can at least say I passed one one. [shrugs]

 
 Posted:   May 21, 2022 - 9:25 AM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)

I rewatched TLJ a week ago and I still love it. I didn't find it slow or dull, thought the story was daring and did something other than remake earlier Star Wars films. My only real issue was Finn was wasted in a storyline that didn't amount to much in the long run other than to fully get him on the side of the resistance. In TFA he was pretty much following Rey around and was with the resistance because he had nowhere else to go. By the end of the film, he'd taken ownership of his place.

Rose was being set up to be a major character and a potential romantic partner for Finn but Disney showed a true lack of balls and caved to the hate. Rose was shoved aside in TROS and they introduced someone else for Finn to play off of.

There was a grim feeling of impending doom throughout The Last Jedi and I appreciated that. I couldn't see the turns coming during the initial viewing, which was great. And I loved that Luke wasn't some perfect, dull monk training 50 Jedi with a pie in the sky point of view. He had a moment of human weakness and it cost him everything. He retreated after that. Yet, again, the character grew and Hamill gave a standout performance. Everyone had an arc. Everyone grew. There was excitement and laughs and twists and I just had a grand time with it.

Knives Out was a lot of fun, a jaunty little mystery with some hammy acting and a light touch. I probably won't see it again, but it was a fun day at the movies.


 
 
 Posted:   May 22, 2022 - 3:35 AM   
 By:   Rick15   (Member)

Interesting thoughts Scott. While I feel that this may be an easier debate in person, I’ll throw in some additional thoughts of my own.

For me, TLJ was a wasted opportunity. Here was a chance to take the SW franchise in a new direction without destroying what came before it.

Rian did take it in a new direction but he took characters (both new and old) and completely changed the fabric of them. A good movie (for me) relies on characters that you can become invested in, that you feel something for. As annoying as TFA was due to it’s reliance on re-visiting the ANH story, it at least introduced characters that I liked and was curious to see where they would go.

TLJ took those characters and destroyed - for no real reason - those characters. No-one grew. And I didn’t care about any of them.

A better story for Luke would have been him receiving his lightsaber and THAT being the moment he realised what he’d become and how he had changed. The rest of that story could have been developed in flashback as well as in the present as he helped Rey reach her potential.

I’m Ok with Star Wars movies changing the mould (errr....mold??).....as long as it makes sense.

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.