Film Score Monthly
FSM HOME MESSAGE BOARD FSM CDs FSM ONLINE RESOURCES FUN STUFF ABOUT US  SEARCH FSM   
Search Terms: 
Search Within:   search tips 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
 
 Posted:   Jan 25, 2012 - 11:53 AM   
 By:   quiller007   (Member)

I believe if a show is listed as having been transferred to HD indicates the dvds will also be forthcoming...or something. Under "Latest Revisions and Additions" you'll see the updated info.


Ah! Thanks mucho.

Den

 
 Posted:   Feb 8, 2012 - 12:01 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

Season 2 of "The FBI" will be out next week from Warner Archive. This will close the Stephen Brooks era of the show, as William Reynolds took over in S3 as Efrem Zimbalist's partner.

Warner Archive in doing this demonstrates that it is committed to multiple season releases of the TV shows they are handling, as this joins "Cheyenne" as the first two shows to get two seasons released through this program.

Also, CBS/Paramount validates what the syndication bible said regarding "Vegas" with the announcement of the first half of S3 for May. The show should join the ranks of the completed on DVD before year's end.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 8, 2012 - 1:33 PM   
 By:   riotengine   (Member)

Only to the degree that CBS/Paramount I think is trying to capitalize on Newhart fans who are fed up with waiting for Fox to unstall both the original Bob Newhart Show and Newhart, that they think they'll go for this.

Yeah, except that the show wasn't very good. I'll bet they sell very few.


I was liking it till they dropped the the 1st season comic book stuff, changing it to a greeting card company. But then, I'm rather biased about that. They used real comics creators in at least one of the episodes (Jim Lee)

Greg Espinoza

 
 Posted:   Feb 8, 2012 - 1:41 PM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)

I'd love to know what's going on with The Fugitive Complete Series. I haven't heard anything since it was withdrawn at the 11th hour...

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 8, 2012 - 1:46 PM   
 By:   riotengine   (Member)

Only to the degree that CBS/Paramount I think is trying to capitalize on Newhart fans who are fed up with waiting for Fox to unstall both the original Bob Newhart Show and Newhart, that they think they'll go for this.

Yeah, except that the show wasn't very good. I'll bet they sell very few.


I was liking it till they dropped the the 1st season comic book stuff, changing it to a greeting card company. But then, I'm rather biased about that. They used real comics creators in at some of episodes (Jim Lee, Jack Kirby)

Greg Espinoza

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 8, 2012 - 1:47 PM   
 By:   riotengine   (Member)

I'd love to know what's going on with The Fugitive Complete Series. I haven't heard anything since it was withdrawn at the 11th hour...

Me too. It's a little too quiet on all fronts regarding that recalled set.

Greg Espinoza

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 8, 2012 - 2:27 PM   
 By:   Rollin Hand   (Member)

So many debacles these days: M-SQUAD, THE SIX MILL, IT TAKES A THIEF, THE FUGITIVE, this and that.

Universal wins the game as the worst studio doing licenses with abysmal materials.
Universal behaves like a common bootlegger selling expensive crap to a brotherhood of blind devotees who are afraid to criticize their con game.
Be very careful in the future with any titles from their back catalogue!!!
Even Amazon is embarrassed concerning those sub-licenses.
Everybody know now that they are known as "Univers Sale".

 
 Posted:   Feb 8, 2012 - 2:48 PM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)

The Fugitive situation I confess to the ultimate "What, me worry?" syndrome since I was one of the lucky few who got a set shipped before the recall!

And I disagree completely regarding the titles Universal has licensed. They give out the best source materials that are available to labels willing to take a chance on them, and there has always been candor from the get-go that these will not be the top of the line remastered stuff because the costs would be too prohibitive. I applaud Universal for doing something with their catalog in that sense which is more than I can say for Fox which won't release anything themselves and has even stopped licensing titles to others completely leaving me with another year of "Burke's Law" hanging that I want to see released more than any other stalled title (not to mention Fox's disgraceful abandonment of "The Big Valley")

 
 Posted:   Feb 8, 2012 - 5:42 PM   
 By:   cgola73   (Member)

I believe if a show is listed as having been transferred to HD indicates the dvds will also be forthcoming...or something. Under "Latest Revisions and Additions" you'll see the updated info.


I'm glad to see in the bible that Streets of San Francisco has season 3 remastered for HD

Was really hoping to see the second season of Barnaby Jones remastered but no luck
The 2nd season had some great episodes and from 1973, my favorite year.
Marjoe Gortner as a rock singer and Jason Evers as his slimy record producer.

Anyone know a current place to write/e-mail CBS/Paramount requesting more seasons?

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 8, 2012 - 9:59 PM   
 By:   filmusicnow   (Member)

The Fugitive situation I confess to the ultimate "What, me worry?" syndrome since I was one of the lucky few who got a set shipped before the recall!

And I disagree completely regarding the titles Universal has licensed. They give out the best source materials that are available to labels willing to take a chance on them, and there has always been candor from the get-go that these will not be the top of the line remastered stuff because the costs would be too prohibitive. I applaud Universal for doing something with their catalog in that sense which is more than I can say for Fox which won't release anything themselves and has even stopped licensing titles to others completely leaving me with another year of "Burke's Law" hanging that I want to see released more than any other stalled title (not to mention Fox's disgraceful abandonment of "The Big Valley")


Not to mention "12 O'Clock High", "The Felony Squad" (my holy grail) and "The Green Hornet". However, I did get word from Twilight Time that they may put some television series out on D.V.D. (though I'm not sure they're from 20th Century-Fox).

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 2:54 AM   
 By:   Rollin Hand   (Member)



And I disagree completely regarding the titles Universal has licensed. They give out the best source materials that are available to labels willing to take a chance on them, and there has always been candor from the get-go that these will not be the top of the line remastered stuff because the costs would be too prohibitive.



Your theory doesn't hold because Paramount restores their back catalogue and nevertheless the price is acceptable. Shame on Universal.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 3:04 AM   
 By:   quiller007   (Member)

I applaud Universal for doing something with their catalog in that sense which is more than I can say for Fox which won't release anything themselves and has even stopped licensing titles to others completely leaving me with another year of "Burke's Law" hanging that I want to see released more than any other stalled title (not to mention Fox's disgraceful abandonment of "The Big Valley")


Don't forget Fox's disgraceful abandonment of HILL STREET BLUES,
one of the biggest blunders any studio has made regarding classic tv.
It's even worse when the title is a continuing "serial" type of show like HSB.
Very annoying. And I don't buy the "disappointing sales" excuse, either.

Den

 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 8:03 AM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)

The Fugitive situation I confess to the ultimate "What, me worry?" syndrome since I was one of the lucky few who got a set shipped before the recall!

Damn, that's pretty awesome luck on your part. I wish I was able to act that quickly on it. Hopefully it's a good set and will eventually get a release without too many negative changes. I just hate the "no news" aspect. TVShowsonDVD.com is a great resource, but if you ask them something, you invaribly get the "if we had news we'd have posted it" answer, which is non-helpful.

 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 10:06 AM   
 By:   Eric Paddon   (Member)


Your theory doesn't hold because Paramount restores their back catalogue and nevertheless the price is acceptable. Shame on Universal.


Paramount does not restore their back catalog across the board. "Cannon" was released unremastered and then stalled out. Paramount is also the studio that set new lows in the art of music replacement (what they did to "The Odd Couple" surpassed what they did to the "Fugitive") whereas Universal is not a studio that has presented that kind of problem. Also, CBS/Paramount has come into criticism for marketing the split season scale of higher prices. When you get Universal material, the rate is usually much better.

Neither studio is perfect, but Universal's virtues outweight their faults.

 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 10:22 AM   
 By:   David Sones (Allardyce)   (Member)

I vote for Sony as the studio who has caused me the most grief on the classic TV front. Too many Season 1 releases of various shows that never get another season, and too many edited/syndicated prints instead of uncut broadcast episodes (I Dream of Jeannie is a butchered mess, as is Soap and several others).

 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 10:48 AM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)

(I Dream of Jeannie is a butchered mess).

I'm curious about your comment, because I never noticed anything missing from I Dream of Jeannie. The only thing that does stand out from those prints are the occasional weird replacement sound effect in some second season episodes that were on the syndicated prints in the 90's. Also the subtitles of what Jeannie was saying in her native language are not on the pilot episode on the DVD sets.

Otherwise, the episodes appear to be intact (although I miss the Screen Gems "S from Hell" missing from most episodes).

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 10:57 AM   
 By:   quiller007   (Member)



I guess ALL of the studios have been negligent regarding their back catalogs
of various tv shows. There hasn't been one instance of any studio not
screwing up at least one of their shows for dvd.

Notice how they don't do these same screw ups with more recent shows
(shows produced over the last 15 - 20 years). It's always our beloved
classics from the 50's, 60's, 70's and sometimes even the 80's.

Den

 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 11:11 AM   
 By:   Scott McOldsmith   (Member)

I agree that the screwed up releases outnumber the "just right's" but there are a number of TV shows from my youth that have been released quite nicely. Such as…

The Incredible Hulk
Twilight Zone
Gilligan's Island
The Man from Uncle
Get Smart
Battlestar Galactica
Planet of the Apes
The Time Tunnel (the only Irwin Allen series released without some sort of screw up somewhere)

There have been some good ones. It's just that these days, it's the norm to do something maddening, like the prints of It Takes a Thief….

 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 11:12 AM   
 By:   Accidental Genius   (Member)

I guess ALL of the studios have been negligent regarding their back catalogs
of various tv shows. There hasn't been one instance of any studio not
screwing up at least one of their shows for dvd.

Notice how they don't do these same screw ups with more recent shows
(shows produced over the last 15 - 20 years). It's always our beloved
classics from the 50's, 60's, 70's and sometimes even the 80's.

Den


Not true. Roseanne, That '70s Show and Will & Grace all had syndication cuts released, with the former two now being corrected for fans who graciously get to re-purchase without any discount if they bought the previous, heinous sets. Luckily, I'm not really a fan of any of these shows. Don't hate 'em, just didn't ever invest in the sets.

 
 
 Posted:   Feb 9, 2012 - 11:54 AM   
 By:   quiller007   (Member)

There have been some good ones. It's just that these days, it's the norm to do something maddening, like the prints of It Takes a Thief….

As Eric already pointed out, Universal is not going to remaster some of their shows
because it's too costly. IT TAKES A THIEF was unfortunately one of the titles
that didn't get the 1991 remastering. It's not really screw up. I guess it was
more of an instance of priorities at that time. Some people keep blaming E One for
the dvd quality. They could only release what Universal gave them.

Den

 
You must log in or register to post.
  Go to page:    
© 2024 Film Score Monthly. All Rights Reserved.
Website maintained and powered by Veraprise and Matrimont.